Sensitivity analysis of the climate of a chaotic system
Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 52:5 (2000) 523-532
Abstract:
This paper addresses some fundamental methodological issues concerning the sensitivity analysis of chaotic geophysical systems. We show, using the Lorenz system as an example, that a naive approach to variational ('adjoint') sensitivity analysis is of limited utility. Applied to trajectories which are long relative to the predictability time scales of the system, cumulative error growth means that adjoint results diverge exponentially from the 'macroscopic climate sensitivity' (that is, the sensitivity of time-averaged properties of the system to finite-amplitude perturbations). This problem occurs even for time-averaged quantities and given infinite computing resources. Alternatively, applied to very short trajectories, the adjoint provides an incorrect estimate of the sensitivity, even if averaged over large numbers of initial conditions, because a finite time scale is required for the model climate to respond fully to certain perturbations. In the Lorenz (1963) system, an intermediate time scale is found on which an ensemble of adjoint gradients can give a reasonably accurate (O(10%)) estimate of the macroscopic climate sensitivity. While this ensemble-adjoint approach is unlikely to be reliable for more complex systems, it may provide useful guidance in identifying important parameter-combinations to be explored further through direct finite-amplitude perturbations.Anthropogenic and Natural Causes of Twentieth Century Temperature Change
Chapter in Solar Variability and Climate, Springer Nature 11 (2000) 337-344
External control of 20th century temperature by natural and anthropogenic forcings
SCIENCE 290:5499 (2000) 2133-2137
How predictability depends on the nature of uncertainty in initial conditions in a coupled model of ENSO
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE 13:18 (2000) 3298-3313
Optimal detection and attribution of climate change: sensitivity of results to climate model differences
CLIMATE DYNAMICS 16:10-11 (2000) 737-754