91̽»¨

Skip to main content
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding 91̽»¨
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
  • Support
91̽»¨
Juno Jupiter image

Professor Lesley Gray

Emeritus

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate dynamics
lesley.gray@retired.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72909
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 109
  • About
  • Publications

Revisiting the controversial issue of tropical tropospheric temperature trends

Geophysical Research Letters 40:11 (2013) 2801-2806

Authors:

DM Mitchell, PW Thorne, PA Stott, LJ Gray

Abstract:

Controversy remains over a discrepancy between modeled and observed tropical upper tropospheric temperature trends. This discrepancy is reassessed using simulations from the Coupled Climate Model Inter-comparison Project phase 5 (CMIP 5) together with radiosonde and surface observations that provide multiple realizations of possible "observed" temperatures given various methods of homogenizing the data. Over the 1979-2008 period, tropical temperature trends are not consistent with observations throughout the depth of the troposphere, and this primarily stems from a poor simulation of the surface temperature trends. This discrepancy is substantially reduced when (1) atmosphere-only simulations are examined or (2) the trends are considered as an amplification of the surface temperature trend with height. Using these approaches, it is shown that within observational uncertainty, the 5-95 percentile range of temperature trends from both coupled-ocean and atmosphere-only models are consistent with the analyzed observations at all but the upper most tropospheric level (150 hPa), and models with ultra-high horizontal resolution (≤ 0.5° × 0.5°) perform particularly well. Other than model resolution, it is hypothesized that this remaining discrepancy could be due to a poor representation of stratospheric ozone or remaining observational uncertainty. © 2013 American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 118:10 (2013) 3956-3971

Authors:

JA Anstey, P Davini, LJ Gray, TJ Woollings, N Butchart, C Cagnazzo, B Christiansen, SC Hardiman, SM Osprey, S Yang

Abstract:

Blocking of the tropospheric jet stream during Northern Hemisphere winter (December-January-February) is examined in a multi-model ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (GCMs) obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The CMIP5 models exhibit large biases in blocking frequency and related biases in tropospheric jet latitude, similar to earlier generations of GCMs. Underestimated blocking at high latitudes, especially over Europe, is common. In general, model biases decrease as model resolution increases. Increased blocking frequency at high latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific basins, as well as more realistic variability of Atlantic jet latitude, are associated with increased vertical resolution in the mid-troposphere to lowermost stratosphere. Finer horizontal resolution is associated with higher blocking frequency at all latitudes in the Atlantic basin but appears to have no systematic impact on blocking near Greenland or in the Pacific basin. Results from the CMIP5 analysis are corroborated by additional controlled experiments using selected GCMs. Key PointsCMIP5 models have large blocking biases and associated jet biasesIncreased spatial resolution is associated with reduced blocking and jet biasesVertical and horizontal resolution give blocking changes in different regions ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES 118:10 (2013) 3956-3971

Authors:

James A Anstey, Paolo Davini, Lesley J Gray, Tim J Woollings, Neal Butchart, Chiara Cagnazzo, Bo Christiansen, Steven C Hardiman, Scott M Osprey, Shuting Yang

Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union (2013)

Authors:

I Ermolli, K Matthes, T Dudok de Wit, NA Krivova, K Tourpali, M Weber, YC Unruh, L Gray, U Langematz, P Pilewskie, others

A mechanism for lagged North Atlantic climate response to solar variability

Geophysical Research Letters 40:2 (2013) 434-439

Authors:

AA Scaife, S Ineson, JR Knight, L Gray, K Kodera, DM Smith

Abstract:

Variability in solar irradiance has been connected to changes in surface climate in the North Atlantic through both observational and climate modelling studies which suggest a response in the atmospheric circulation that resembles the North Atlantic Oscillation or its hemispheric equivalent the Arctic Oscillation. It has also been noted that this response appears to follow the changes in solar irradiance by a few years, depending on the exact indicator of solar variability. Here we propose and test a mechanism for this lag based on the known impact of atmospheric circulation on the Atlantic Ocean, the extended memory of ocean heat content anomalies, and their subsequent feedback onto the atmosphere. We use results from climate model experiments to develop a simple model for the relationship between solar variability and North Atlantic climate. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Current page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer 91̽»¨

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

91̽»¨,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

Department Of Physics text logo

© 91̽»¨ - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Giving to Physics