91探花

Skip to main content
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding 91探花
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
  • Support
91探花
Juno Jupiter image

Dr Scott Osprey FRMetS

Senior NCAS Research Scientist

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate dynamics
  • Predictability of weather and climate
Scott.Osprey@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)82434,01865 (2)72923
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 111
  • About
  • Publications

Role of the quasi-biennial oscillation in alleviating biases in the semi-annual oscillation

Weather and Climate Dynamics Copernicus Publications 5:4 (2024) 1489-1504

Authors:

Aleena M Jaison, Lesley Gray, Scott M Osprey, Jeff R Knight, Martin B Andrews

Abstract:

Model representations of the stratospheric semi-annual oscillation (SAO) show a common easterly bias, with a weaker westerly phase and stronger easterly phase compared to observations. Previous studies have shown that both resolved and parameterized tropical waves in the upper stratosphere are too weak. These waves propagate vertically through the underlying region dominated by the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) before reaching the SAO altitudes. The influence of biases in the modelled QBO on the representation of the SAO is therefore explored. Correcting the QBO biases helps to reduce the SAO easterly bias through improved filtering of resolved and parameterized waves that contribute to improving both the westerly and the easterly phases of the SAO. The time-averaged zonal-mean zonal winds at SAO altitudes change by up to 25鈥% in response to the QBO bias corrections. The annual cycle in the equatorial upper stratosphere is improved as well. Most of the improvements in the SAO occur during the QBO easterly phase, coinciding with the period when the model's QBO exhibits the largest bias. Nevertheless, despite correcting for the QBO bias, there remains a substantial easterly bias in the SAO, suggesting that westerly wave forcing in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere is still severely under-represented.

Quasi-Biennial Oscillation

Chapter in Atmospheric oscillations: sources of subseasonal-to-seasonal variability and predictability, Elsevier (2024) 253-275

Authors:

Yue Wang, Jian Rao, Zefan Ju, Scott M Osprey

Abstract:

The Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) is one of the most cyclic phenomena in the atmosphere except for the annular and diurnal cycles, which provide the predictability source for subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts on the globe. The QBO is generated by the interaction between the background circulation and the equatorial waves, which cover a wide spectrum consisting of those that are eastward- and westward-propagating. The QBO can affect the climate in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres through at least three dynamic pathways, including the stratospheric polar vortex pathway, the subtropical downward-arching zonal wind pathway, and the tropical convection pathway. The impact of the QBO on the extratropics is projected to strengthen in future scenario experiments, although the maximum QBO wind magnitude gradually decreased in recent decades. As a newly emerging feature, the QBO disruption during the westerly phase is mainly caused by the extremely active Rossby waves from the extratropics. The QBO disruptions are likely to increase in a warmer climate background.

Supplementary material to "Solar cycle impacts on North Atlantic climate"

(2024)

Authors:

Paula LM Gonzalez, Lesley J Gray, Stergios Misios, Scott Osprey, Hedi Ma

A momentum budget study of the semi鈥恆nnual oscillation in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Wiley (2024)

Authors:

Aleena M Jaison, Lesley J Gray, Scott Osprey, Anne K Smith, Rolando R Garcia

Abstract:

The representation of the semi鈥恆nnual oscillation (SAO) in climate models shows a common easterly bias of several tens of metres per second compared to observations. These biases could be due to deficiencies in eastward tropical wave forcing, the position or strength of the climatological summertime jet or the strength/timing of the Brewer鈥揇obson circulation. This motivates further analysis of the momentum budget of the upper stratosphere within models and a more detailed comparison with reanalyses to determine the origin of the bias. In this study, the transformed Eulerian mean momentum equation is used to evaluate the different forcing terms that contribute to the SAO in the MERRA2 reanalysis dataset. This is then compared with the equivalent analysis using data from a climate simulation of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM). The comparison shows that WACCM underestimates eastward forcing by both resolved and parameterised waves at equatorial latitudes when compared with MERRA2 and also has a weaker tropical upwelling above 1 hPa.

Comparison between non鈥恛rographic gravity鈥恮ave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant鈥恖evel balloons

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Wiley (2024)

Authors:

F Lott, R Rani, C McLandress, A Podglajen, A Bushell, M Bramberger, H鈥怟 Lee, J Alexander, J Anstey, H鈥怸 Chun, A Hertzog, N Butchart, Y鈥怘 Kim, Y Kawatani, B Legras, E Manzini, H Naoe, S Osprey, R Plougonven, H Pohlmann, JH Richter, J Scinocca, J Garc铆a鈥怱errano, F Serva

Abstract:

Gravity鈥恮ave (GW) parameterizations from 12 general circulation models (GCMs) participating in the Quasi鈥怋iennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) are compared with Strateole 2 balloon observations made in the tropical lower stratosphere from November 2019鈥揊ebruary 2020 (phase 1) and from October 2021鈥揓anuary 2022 (phase 2). The parameterizations employ the three standard techniques used in GCMs to represent subgrid鈥恠cale non鈥恛rographic GWs, namely the two globally spectral techniques developed by Warner and McIntyre (1999) and Hines (1997), as well as the 鈥渕ultiwaves鈥 approaches following the work of Lindzen (1981). The input meteorological fields necessary to run the parameterizations offline are extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis and correspond to the meteorological conditions found underneath the balloons. In general, there is fair agreement between amplitudes derived from measurements for waves with periods less than 1 $$ 1 $$ h and parameterizations. The correlation between the daily observations and the corresponding results of the parameterization can be around 0.4, which is 99 % $$ 99\% $$ significant, since 1200 days of observations are used. Given that the parameterizations have only been tuned to produce a quasi鈥恇iennial oscillation (QBO) in the models, the 0.4 correlation coefficient of the GW momentum fluxes is surprisingly good. These correlations nevertheless vary between schemes and depend little on their formulation (globally spectral versus multiwaves for instance). We therefore attribute these correlations to dynamical filtering, which all schemes take into account, whereas only a few relate the gravity waves to their sources. Statistically significant correlations are mostly found for eastward鈥恜ropagating waves, which may be due to the fact that during both Strateole 2 phases the QBO is easterly at the altitude of the balloon flights. We also found that the probability density functions (pdfs) of the momentum fluxes are represented better in spectral schemes with constant sources than in schemes (鈥渟pectral鈥 or 鈥渕ultiwaves鈥) that relate GWs only to their convective sources.

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Current page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer 91探花

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

91探花,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

Department Of Physics text logo

漏 91探花 - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Giving to Physics