Efficacy of climate forcings in PDRMIP models
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres American Geophysical Union 124:23 (2019) 12824-12844
Abstract:
Quantifying the efficacy of different climate forcings is important for understanding the real鈥恮orld climate sensitivity. This study presents a systematic multi鈥恗odel analysis of different climate driver efficacies using simulations from the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP). Efficacies calculated from instantaneous radiative forcing deviate considerably from unity across forcing agents and models. Effective radiative forcing (ERF) is a better predictor of global mean near鈥恠urface air temperature (GSAT) change. Efficacies are closest to one when ERF is computed using fixed sea surface temperature experiments and adjusted for land surface temperature changes using radiative kernels. Multi鈥恗odel mean efficacies based on ERF are close to one for global perturbations of methane, sulphate, black carbon and insolation, but there is notable inter鈥恗odel spread. We do not find robust evidence that the geographic location of sulphate aerosol affects its efficacy. GSAT is found to respond more slowly to aerosol forcing than CO2 in the early stages of simulations. Despite these differences, we find that there is no evidence for an efficacy effect on historical GSAT trend estimates based on simulations with an impulse response model, nor on the resulting estimates of climate sensitivity derived from the historical period. However, the considerable intermodel spread in the computed efficacies means that we cannot rule out an efficacy鈥恑nduced bias of 卤0.4 K in equilibrium climate sensitivity to CO2 doubling (ECS) when estimated using the historical GSAT trend.Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change
Reviews of Geophysics American Geophysical Union 58:1 (2019) e2019RG000660
Abstract:
Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable, and arguable lines of evidence, including modeling approaches, theoretical considerations, and observations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol鈥恟adiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol鈥恉riven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed鈥恜hase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of 鈥1.6 to 鈥0.6 W m鈭2, or 鈥2.0 to 鈥0.4 W m鈭2 with a 90% likelihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment but shifted toward more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial鈥恊ra changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds.tobac 1.2: towards a flexible framework for tracking and analysis of clouds in diverse datasets
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT 12:11 (2019) 4551-4570
Ensembles of global climate model variants designed for the quantification and constraint of uncertainty in aerosols and their radiative forcing
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems American Geophysical Union 11:11 (2019) 3728-3754
Abstract:
Tropospheric aerosol radiative forcing has persisted for many years as one of the major causes of uncertainty in global climate model simulations. To sample the range of plausible aerosol and atmospheric states and perform robust statistical analyses of the radiative forcing, it is important to account for the combined effects of many sources of model uncertainty, which is rarely done due to the high computational cost. This paper describes the designs of two ensembles of the HadGEM-UKCA global climate model and provides the first analyses of the uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing and their causes. The first ensemble was designed to comprehensively sample uncertainty in the aerosol state, while the other samples additional uncertainties in the physical model related to clouds, humidity and radiation, thereby allowing an analysis of uncertainty in the aerosol effective radiative forcing. Each ensemble consists of around 200 simulations of the pre-industrial and present-day atmospheres. The uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing in our ensembles is comparable to the range of estimates from multi-model intercomparison projects. The mean aerosol effective radiative forcing is 鈥1.45 W m鈥2 (credible interval 鈥2.07 to 鈥0.81 W m鈥2), which encompasses but is more negative than the 鈥1.17 W m鈥2 in the 2013 Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and 鈥0.90 W m鈥2 in the IPCC 5th 47 Assessment Report. The ensembles can be used to reduce aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty by challenging them with multiple measurements as well as to isolate potential causes of multi-model differences.Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Copernicus Publications 19:20 (2019) 12887-12899