Super-Earth lava planet from birth to observation: photochemistry, tidal heating, and volatile-rich formation
Copernicus Publications (2025)
Abstract:
Larger-than-Earth exoplanets are sculpted by strong stellar irradiation, but it is unknown whence they originate. Two propositions are that they formed with rocky interiors and hydrogen-rich envelopes (鈥榞as-dwarfs鈥), or with bulk compositions rich in water-ices (鈥榳ater-worlds鈥) . Multiple observations of super-Earth L 98-59 d have revealed its low bulk-density, consistent with substantial volatile content alongside a rocky/metallic interior, and recent JWST spectroscopy evidences a high mean molecular weight atmosphere. Its density and composition make it a waymarker for disentangling the processes which separate super-Earths and sub-Neptunes across geological timescales. We simulate the possible pathways for L 98-59 d from birth up to the present day using a comprehensive evolutionary modelling framework. Emerging from our calculations is a novel self-limiting mechanism between radiative cooling, tidal heating, and mantle rheology, which we term the 'radiation-tide-rheology feedback'. Coupled numerical modelling yields self-limiting tidal heating estimates that are up to two orders of magnitude lower than previous calculations, and yet are still large enough to enable the extension of primordial magma oceans to Gyr timescales. Our analysis indicates that the planet formed with a large amount (>1.8 mass%) of sulfur and hydrogen, and a chemically-reducing mantle; inconsistent with both the canonical gas-dwarf and water-world scenarios. A thick atmosphere and tidal heating sustain a permanent deep magma ocean, allowing the dissolution and retention of volatiles within its mantle. Transmission features can be explained by in-situ photochemical production of SO2 in a high-molecular weight H2-H2S background. These results subvert the emerging gas-dwarf vs. water-world dichotomy of small planet categorisation, inviting a more nuanced classification framework. We show that interactions between planetary interiors and atmospheres shape their observable characteristics over billions of years.The Cosmic Shoreline Revisited: A Metric for Atmospheric Retention Informed by Hydrodynamic Escape
Copernicus Publications (2025)
Abstract:
The 鈥渃osmic shoreline鈥, a semi-empirical relation that separates airless worlds from worlds with atmospheres as proposed by Zahnle & Catling (2017), is now guiding large-scale JWST surveys aimed at detecting rocky exoplanet atmospheres. We expand upon this framework by revisiting the shorelines using existing hydrodynamic escape models applied to Earth-like, Venus-like, and steam atmospheres for rocky exoplanets, and we estimate energy-limited escape rates for CH4 atmospheres. We determine the critical instellation required for atmospheric retention by calculating time-integrated atmospheric mass loss. Our analysis introduces a new metric for target selection in the Rocky Worlds DDT and refines expectations for rocky planet atmosphere searches in Cycle 4. Exploring initial volatile inventory ranging from 0.01% to 1% of planetary mass, we find that its variation prevents the definition of a unique clear-cut shoreline, though non-linear escape physics can reduce this sensitivity to initial conditions. Additionally, uncertain distributions of high-energy stellar evolution and planet age further blur the critical instellations for atmospheric retention, yielding broad shorelines. Hydrodynamic escape models find atmospheric retention is markedly more favorable for higher-mass planets orbiting higher-mass stars, with carbon-rich atmospheres remaining plausible for 55 Cancri e despite its extreme instellation. Dedicated modelling efforts are needed to better constrain the escape dynamics of secondary atmospheres, such as the role of atomic line cooling, especially for Earth-sized planets. Finally, we illustrate how density measurements can be used to statistically test the existence of the cosmic shorelines, emphasizing the need for more precise mass and radius measurements.The Role of Bottom Thermal Forcing on Modulating Baroclinic Instability in a Jupiter GCM
Copernicus Publications (2025)
Abstract:
The atmospheric circulation of Jupiter is shaped by a complex interplay between deep internal processes and cloud-level dynamics. Numerical simulations and observational analyses have suggested that Jupiter鈥檚 mid-latitude jets are strongly influenced by baroclinic instability [1], which is governed by the planet鈥檚 atmospheric thermal structure. Jupiter emits a substantial intrinsic heat flux originating from its interior. Past modelling efforts [2, 3] have demonstrated that this internal energy plays a key role in shaping large-scale atmospheric dynamics.Our previous work [4] showed that latitudinal variations in interior heat flux can significantly impact the structure and behaviour of Jupiter鈥檚 mid-latitude jets in a General Circulation Model (GCM).聽 Such an impact is best illustrated by the relative vorticity snapshots from two simulations with the lowest and highest latitudinal flux gradient (see Figure鈥1). In this study, we present a more detailed analysis linking these jet modifications to changes in the atmospheric thermal structure and, consequently, to the strength and distribution of baroclinic eddy activity. In particular, we use the Lorenz energy cycle framework to diagnose how variations in deep thermal forcing influence baroclinic energy conversion and eddy-mean flow interactions. We further examine the implications for meridional transport and the water cycle within Jupiter鈥檚 weather layer.Additionally, we present a control simulation in which the potential temperature at the model鈥檚 lower boundary is forced toward a fixed value (a deep adiabat setup). We compute the equivalent upward heat flux associated with this forcing to place it in the context of previous models that impose constant or latitudinally varying interior heat flux. This allows a direct comparison of how different representations of deep thermal forcing affect upper-atmospheric dynamics.Finally, we discuss the broader implications of these findings for future weather-layer models of Jupiter and other gas giant planets, especially on the effect of bottom boundary conditions in representing the coupling between deep and observable atmospheric dynamics.聽Figure 1: Mollweide projection of the relative vorticity at 1 bar at the end of two simulations.Reference:[1] Read, P. L. (2023). The dynamics of Jupiter鈥檚 and Saturn鈥檚 weather layers: a synthesis after Cassini and Juno. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 56(1), 271鈥293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121021-040058[2] Liu, J., & Schneider, T. (2011). Convective Generation of Equatorial Superrotation in Planetary Atmospheres. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 68(11), 2742-2756. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-10-05013.1[3] Young, R. M. B., Read, P. L., & Wang, Y. (2018). Simulating Jupiter鈥檚 weather layer. Part I: Jet spin-up in a dry atmosphere. Icarus, 326, 225鈥252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.005[鈥4] Hu, X. and Read, P.: Latitudinal Variation in Internal Heat Flux in Jupiter's Atmosphere: Effect on Weather Layer Dynamics, Europlanet Science Congress 2024, EPSC2024-669, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2024-669, 2024.What are subNeptunes made of?
(2025)
Abstract:
Absence of a Runaway Greenhouse Limit on Lava Planets
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 987:2 (2025) 172